telegram频道爬虫www.tel8.vip)是一个Telegram群组分享平台。telegram频道爬虫包括telegram频道爬虫、telegram群组索引、Telegram群组导航、新加坡telegram群组、telegram中文群组、telegram群组(其他)、Telegram 美国 群组、telegram群组爬虫、电报群 科学上网、小飞机 怎么 加 群、tg群等内容。telegram频道爬虫为广大电报用户提供各种电报群组/电报频道/电报机器人导航服务。

Former Felda chairman Shahrir bin Abdul Samad is charged with money laundering. – The Malaysian Insight file pic, July 27, 2022.

A BANK officer today told the High Court that he could not confirm whether the money amounting to RM63,800 that was deposited into a bank account in the name of an engineering and construction company, belonged personally to Shahrir bin Abdul Samad.

Public Bank Berhad Banking Services manager Tan Kok Kiong, 32, said he also could not confirm that the money that was deposited through a cheque dated March 22, 2014 into a Public Bank account under the name of ZAM Engineering & Construction was entrusted to Shahrir.

The third prosecution witness said this during cross-examination by counsel Shazreen Mohd Hatta, who represented Shahrir at the trial of the former Felda chairman who is charged with failing to declare RM1 million, which he received from Najib Tun Razak, to the Inland Revenue Board (IRB).

Tan, who works at the Muar branch of Public Bank agreed with the lawyer’s suggestion that he could not confirm if the money that went into the company’s bank account was actually a reimbursement.

Earlier, when reading his witness statement, Tan said that the account opening application was made by two individuals, namely Hamidah Basir and Nur Faizah Zulkifli, who are partners in ZAM Engineering & Construction, on Jan 25, 2013 and RM63,800 was deposited via a cheque into the account on March 24, 2014. 

The witness added that RM63,800 was a normal transaction that was not suspicious because it was not a large amount for a company account.

,

免费足球推介网www.hgbbs.vip)是国内最权威的足球赛事报道、预测平台。免费提供赛事直播,免费足球贴士,免费足球推介,免费专家贴士,免费足球推荐,最专业的免费足球推介网。

,

“If there is suspicion in a transaction involving a cheque, does the bank have the right not to proceed with the transaction?” asked counsel, to which the witness replied “Yes.”

Shazreen: The balance in the Public Bank account was RM529.60 before the RM63,800 went into the bank account. Is the sudden deposit of RM63,800 something suspicious? 

Tan: No, because it’s a construction company and it may get payment for a contract.

During re-examination by deputy public prosecutor Natrah Fareha Rahmat, the witness said that he could only confirm that money was deposited into the account but could not verify the source of the money. 

Meanwhile, assistant branch manager of Malayan Banking Berhad, Salniza Abdul Rahman, 49, told the court that RM10,000 was deposited through a cheque into the Maybank account of Taman Kebun Teh Umno branch, Johor on Dec 10, 2013.

According to the fourth prosecution witness, the Umno branch account was managed by three individuals, namely Shahrir bin Abdul Samad, who was then the branch chief; treasurer Murad Mohd Taib and secretary Mohd Salaehudin Ali.

声明:该文看法仅代表作者自己,与Sunbet 申博无关。转载请注明:telegram频道爬虫(www.tel8.vip):Bank officer can\u2019t confirm whether RM63,800 belonged to Shahrir Samad
发布评论

分享到:

Usdt第三方支付:IMF revises Malaysia\u2019s 2022 GDP growth forecast to 5.1%
你是第一个吃螃蟹的人
发表评论

◎欢迎参与讨论,请在这里发表您的看法、交流您的观点。